Verdict Background

ROBINHOOD CHAIN · ID 4663

THE VERDICT

The last receipt on record for this token — not a live scan.

66
CAUTION
AA
Apple • Robinhood Token
AAPL
0xaf3d76…93f9EXPLORER ↗
scored under v1.33
LIQUIDITY$327,197
24H VOL$16,655
FDV$1,659,851
24H BUYS432
24H SELLS87
PRICE · DEX MARKET DATA
Verdict #142 · d857eb18…d42f · chained to 80b2ffc3…e454 · scored under v1.33 VERIFY IN THE LEDGER
THE RECORD

1 VERDICT ON RECORD

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
ADDRESSES OF INTEREST
LP CUSTODYEXPLORER ↗
HOLDER CONCENTRATIONEXPLORER ↗
LP CUSTODYFAIL

None of this CL pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider is , a plain wallet, and not the deployer. It controls 66.6% of this pool's liquidity and can withdraw it at any moment. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. This pool is on Up CL and holds 16.9% of the liquidity this scan could read. The deepest pool this scan could read (Uniswap V4, 35.0% of the liquidity we read) was assessed separately: its custody could not be fully traced.

HOLDER CONCENTRATIONFAIL

Top 10 holders hold 56.0% of the circulating float. On raw total supply that's 26.9%, because 52.0% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. The single largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 22.6% of the float on its own.

DANGEROUS FUNCTIONSFAIL

Privileged capabilities present and reachable via a live or unresolved authority: initialization, supply mint, arbitrary code execution, trading pause.

UNREAD SCORING SURFACEWARN

28 points of this token's scoring surface could not be read this scan, so the score is capped at 84 (the top of CAUTION). A check that stands down for want of data deducts nothing, so without this cap a failed read would look the same as a clean result. This is about what we could see, not about the token.

IMPERSONATIONPASS

No canonical asset collision.

ASK ROBIN KNIGHT

AAPL scores 66 — CAUTION. LP custody is the one that moved it, 18 points off. Ask me why.

DRAWN FROM THIS VERDICT’S CHECKS — NOT A MODEL ANSWER

OPENS THE PANEL — THAT IS WHERE YOU TYPE

SECURITY DETAILS
HONEYPOT
SKIP

Sell quotes through the (hookless) pool: exitable. But the V4 Quoter does not settle token balances, and the token's own transfer layer could not be probed (could not locate the balances storage slot (non-standard layout), so no transfer could be simulated) — so nothing here exercised the layer where a sell is actually blocked, and no exit conclusion is drawn.

LP CUSTODYw18 · −18
FAIL

None of this CL pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider is , a plain wallet, and not the deployer. It controls 66.6% of this pool's liquidity and can withdraw it at any moment. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. This pool is on Up CL and holds 16.9% of the liquidity this scan could read. The deepest pool this scan could read (Uniswap V4, 35.0% of the liquidity we read) was assessed separately: its custody could not be fully traced.

CONTRACT OWNERSHIPw10
SKIP

No owner() function, but the contract audit could not attribute the contract's authority surface, so ownerlessness is not established.

UPGRADEABLE PROXYw8
PASS

Upgradeable under the registered Robinhood stock beacon — issuer infrastructure, not a deployer key.

SOURCE VERIFICATIONw8
PASS

Contract source is verified on the explorer. Read at its implementation .

DANGEROUS FUNCTIONSw6 · −6
FAIL

Privileged capabilities present and reachable via a live or unresolved authority: initialization, supply mint, arbitrary code execution, trading pause.

TAX MANIPULATIONw6
PASS

No fee or limit toggling by the deployer in the transactions searched. This looks at the deployer's recent history only, so calls by a separate fee authority are out of its reach.

Think this verdict got it wrong?FLAG IT IN THE TELEGRAM CHAT ↗

Heads up: the scanner is improved continuously, and some fixes only surface once they meet real tokens on production. Our trusted registry — verified LP lockers, known-good launchpad contracts — is checked and approved by a human on the team, so a legitimate project can score lower for a while until we've confirmed its contracts ourselves. A low score is a prompt to look closer, not a conclusion.

ASK ROBIN KNIGHT

Ask why this verdict reads the way it does.