ROBINHOOD CHAIN · ID 4663
THE VERDICT
The last receipt on record for this token — not a live scan.
3 VERDICTS ON RECORD · MOVED -59 SINCE FIRST SCAN (79 → 20)
Deployer removed liquidity from this token's own pool: 1 on-chain withdrawal event(s) on uniswap-v4, 1 of which emptied the position outright.
None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider is , a smart-account wallet, and not the deployer. It controls 100.0% of this pool's liquidity and can withdraw it at any moment. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 91.0% of the liquidity this scan could read.
Deepest pool holds $1, effectively dead.
FDV is 3362× liquidity, so the valuation is mostly paper.
No supported WETH V3 pool exists, so buy/sell simulation is unavailable. A sell was simulated on another venue and did not resolve: Neither direction quotes on this V4 pool: not provably tradeable (dead/uninitialized pool, not a trap).
DOOM scores 20 — CRITICAL. Deployer pulled liquidity capped it outright — the other checks did not get a vote. Ask me what that means before you trade it.
DRAWN FROM THIS VERDICT’S CHECKS — NOT A MODEL ANSWER
OPENS THE PANEL — THAT IS WHERE YOU TYPE
No supported WETH V3 pool exists, so buy/sell simulation is unavailable. A sell was simulated on another venue and did not resolve: Neither direction quotes on this V4 pool: not provably tradeable (dead/uninitialized pool, not a trap).
None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider is , a smart-account wallet, and not the deployer. It controls 100.0% of this pool's liquidity and can withdraw it at any moment. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 91.0% of the liquidity this scan could read.
No owner() function. No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy. The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer.
No privileged capabilities found in the audited source and bytecode.
No fee or limit toggling by the deployer in the transactions searched. This looks at the deployer's recent history only, so calls by a separate fee authority are out of its reach.
Heads up: the scanner is improved continuously, and some fixes only surface once they meet real tokens on production. Our trusted registry — verified LP lockers, known-good launchpad contracts — is checked and approved by a human on the team, so a legitimate project can score lower for a while until we've confirmed its contracts ourselves. A low score is a prompt to look closer, not a conclusion.
Ask why this verdict reads the way it does.