ROBINHOOD CHAIN · ID 4663
THE VERDICT
The last receipt on record for this token — not a live scan.
1 VERDICT ON RECORD
Privileged capabilities present and reachable via a live or unresolved authority: fee change, supply mint, initialization.
Top 10 wallets hold 31.3% of the circulating float. On raw total supply that's 23.7%, because 24.5% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The single largest wallet is , holding 4.1% of the float on its own.
Elevated turnover: 13× liquidity.
10 active paid DexScreener boosts. Someone is paying for visibility — organic demand doesn't need to.
The same contract template has been deployed 3 times, a copycat pattern.
Emilio scores 75 — CAUTION. Dangerous functions is the one that moved it, 6 points off. Ask me why.
DRAWN FROM THIS VERDICT’S CHECKS — NOT A MODEL ANSWER
OPENS THE PANEL — THAT IS WHERE YOU TYPE
Sell quotes through the pool and its swap hook: exitable. Note: the V4 Quoter does not settle token balances, and the token's transfer layer could not be probed (could not locate the balances storage slot (non-standard layout), so no transfer could be simulated) — that specific layer was skipped as inconclusive, not counted as clean.
Only 0.0% of this pool's liquidity could be traced to a holder, so no conclusion is drawn about who controls it. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and backs 97.6% of the token's pooled liquidity.
No owner() function. No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy. The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer.
Privileged capabilities present and reachable via a live or unresolved authority: fee change, supply mint, initialization.
No fee or limit toggling in the deployer's recent history.
Heads up: the scanner is improved continuously, and some fixes only surface once they meet real tokens on production. Our trusted registry — verified LP lockers, known-good launchpad contracts — is checked and approved by a human on the team, so a legitimate project can score lower for a while until we've confirmed its contracts ourselves. A low score is a prompt to look closer, not a conclusion.
Ask why this verdict reads the way it does.