ROBINHOOD CHAIN · ID 4663
THE VERDICT
The last receipt on record for this token — not a live scan.
3 VERDICTS ON RECORD · MOVED +0 SINCE FIRST SCAN (84 → 84)
Unverified contract source.
60 points of this token's scoring surface could not be read this scan, so the score is capped at 84 (the top of CAUTION). A check that stands down for want of data deducts nothing, so without this cap a failed read would look the same as a clean result. This is about what we could see, not about the token.
Pool is 26.9h old, under the 48h line.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN and source unverified: the bytecode is opaque.
No canonical asset collision.
JDOG scores 84 — CAUTION. Source verification is the one that moved it, 8 points off. Ask me why.
DRAWN FROM THIS VERDICT’S CHECKS — NOT A MODEL ANSWER
OPENS THE PANEL — THAT IS WHERE YOU TYPE
Sell quotes through the (hookless) pool: exitable. A direct transfer probe also clears the token's own transfer layer, which the V4 Quoter alone cannot exercise.
Only 0.0% of this pool's liquidity could be traced to a holder, so no conclusion is drawn about who controls it. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 99.8% of the liquidity this scan could read.
No owner() function, and the contract's source is unverified, so its authority surface could not be enumerated and ownerlessness is not established.
Not an upgradeable proxy. The code is fixed.
Unverified contract source.
No mint/pause/blacklist/limit functions found in bytecode.
No fee or limit toggling by the deployer in the transactions searched. This looks at the deployer's recent history only, so calls by a separate fee authority are out of its reach.
Heads up: the scanner is improved continuously, and some fixes only surface once they meet real tokens on production. Our trusted registry — verified LP lockers, known-good launchpad contracts — is checked and approved by a human on the team, so a legitimate project can score lower for a while until we've confirmed its contracts ourselves. A low score is a prompt to look closer, not a conclusion.
Ask why this verdict reads the way it does.