ROBINHOOD CHAIN · ID 4663
THE VERDICT
The last receipt on record for this token — not a live scan.
1 VERDICT ON RECORD
68 points of this token's scoring surface could not be read this scan, so the score is capped at 84 (the top of CAUTION). A check that stands down for want of data deducts nothing, so without this cap a failed read would look the same as a clean result. This is about what we could see, not about the token.
Top 10 holders hold 36.6% of the circulating float. On raw total supply that's 33.3%, because 9.2% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. The single largest holder is , a contract, holding 14.4% of the float on its own.
No canonical asset collision.
Buy and sell both simulate cleanly, including as two independent fresh wallets paying this chain's live gas price (44692000 wei).
No prior honeypot on record.
LOCK scores 84 — CAUTION. Holder concentration is the one that moved it, 5 points off. Ask me why.
DRAWN FROM THIS VERDICT’S CHECKS — NOT A MODEL ANSWER
OPENS THE PANEL — THAT IS WHERE YOU TYPE
Buy and sell both simulate cleanly, including as two independent fresh wallets paying this chain's live gas price (44692000 wei).
Explorer answered but recorded no creator for this contract, and this token's pools gave no conclusive custody answer either.
No owner() function. No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy. The code is fixed.
The explorer that answered does not report source verification, so it could not be established either way.
No privileged capabilities found in the audited source and bytecode.
Explorer unreachable. Source data unavailable.
Heads up: the scanner is improved continuously, and some fixes only surface once they meet real tokens on production. Our trusted registry — verified LP lockers, known-good launchpad contracts — is checked and approved by a human on the team, so a legitimate project can score lower for a while until we've confirmed its contracts ourselves. A low score is a prompt to look closer, not a conclusion.
Ask why this verdict reads the way it does.