ROBINHOOD CHAIN · ID 4663
THE VERDICT
The last receipt on record for this token — not a live scan.
1 VERDICT ON RECORD
130 active paid DexScreener boosts — a heavy bought-visibility campaign. Organic demand doesn't need to pay for placement; campaigns this size are how coordinated pumps recruit exit liquidity.
None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider — , a contract, NOT the deployer — holds 100.0% of the liquidity holding up the price. This contract is not a trusted locker, so this liquidity is not considered locked. Its controller or contract logic may still transfer or withdraw it; contract audit is required before making a stronger claim. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and backs 99.8% of the token's pooled liquidity.
Top 10 holders hold 32.6% of the circulating float. On raw total supply that's 18.4%, because 43.4% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The single largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 6.7% of the float on its own.
Pool is 10.9h old, under the 48h line.
Contract deployed 14.9h ago.
MOMO scores 77 — CAUTION. LP custody is the one that moved it, 9 points off. Ask me why.
DRAWN FROM THIS VERDICT’S CHECKS — NOT A MODEL ANSWER
OPENS THE PANEL — THAT IS WHERE YOU TYPE
Sell quotes through the (hookless) pool: exitable. Note: the V4 Quoter does not settle token balances, and the token's transfer layer could not be probed (could not locate the balances storage slot (non-standard layout), so no transfer could be simulated) — that specific layer was skipped as inconclusive, not counted as clean.
None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider — , a contract, NOT the deployer — holds 100.0% of the liquidity holding up the price. This contract is not a trusted locker, so this liquidity is not considered locked. Its controller or contract logic may still transfer or withdraw it; contract audit is required before making a stronger claim. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and backs 99.8% of the token's pooled liquidity.
No owner() function, and the contract audit did not complete, so ownerlessness is not established.
Not an upgradeable proxy. The code is fixed.
Contract source is partially verified on the explorer — a bytecode-database match, not an exact source match.
No mint/pause/blacklist/limit functions found in bytecode.
No fee or limit toggling by the deployer in the transactions searched. This looks at the deployer's recent history only, so calls by a separate fee authority are out of its reach.
Heads up: the scanner is improved continuously, and some fixes only surface once they meet real tokens on production. Our trusted registry — verified LP lockers, known-good launchpad contracts — is checked and approved by a human on the team, so a legitimate project can score lower for a while until we've confirmed its contracts ourselves. A low score is a prompt to look closer, not a conclusion.
Ask why this verdict reads the way it does.