ROBINHOOD CHAIN · ID 4663
THE VERDICT
The last receipt on record for this token — not a live scan.
2 VERDICTS ON RECORD · MOVED +11 SINCE FIRST SCAN (75 → 86)
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
Sell quotes through the (hookless) pool: exitable. A direct transfer probe also clears the token's own transfer layer, which the V4 Quoter alone cannot exercise.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
STRIKE scores 86 — CLEAR. Holder concentration is the one that moved it, 10 points off. Ask me why.
DRAWN FROM THIS VERDICT’S CHECKS — NOT A MODEL ANSWER
OPENS THE PANEL — THAT IS WHERE YOU TYPE
Sell quotes through the (hookless) pool: exitable. A direct transfer probe also clears the token's own transfer layer, which the V4 Quoter alone cannot exercise.
The token's deepest pool per market data () (~$356573) could not be read on-chain this scan. The venue(s) that were read back only ~4.3% of the token's market-reported liquidity, so a controlling holder there is a caution, not a custody failure. None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider — , a plain wallet, NOT the deployer — controls 99.9% of the liquidity holding up the price and can withdraw it at any moment. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and backs 97.0% of the token's pooled liquidity.
No owner() function, and the contract audit did not complete, so ownerlessness is not established.
Not an upgradeable proxy. The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer.
No mint/pause/blacklist/limit functions found in bytecode.
No fee or limit toggling by the deployer in the transactions searched. This looks at the deployer's recent history only, so calls by a separate fee authority are out of its reach.
Heads up: the scanner is improved continuously, and some fixes only surface once they meet real tokens on production. Our trusted registry — verified LP lockers, known-good launchpad contracts — is checked and approved by a human on the team, so a legitimate project can score lower for a while until we've confirmed its contracts ourselves. A low score is a prompt to look closer, not a conclusion.
Ask why this verdict reads the way it does.