ROBINHOOD CHAIN · ID 4663
THE VERDICT
The last receipt on record for this token — not a live scan.
5 VERDICTS ON RECORD · MOVED +9 SINCE FIRST SCAN (82 → 91)
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
Buy and sell both simulate cleanly, including as two independent fresh wallets.
No liquidity removal from this token's own pool, and none in the deployer's recent history.
No rug lineage on record for this deployer's funding wallet.
SWOGE scores 91 — CLEAR. LP custody is the one that moved it, 9 points off. Ask me why.
DRAWN FROM THIS VERDICT’S CHECKS — NOT A MODEL ANSWER
OPENS THE PANEL — THAT IS WHERE YOU TYPE
Buy and sell both simulate cleanly, including as two independent fresh wallets.
A small alternate venue has pullable liquidity, but it backs too little of the token's pooled liquidity to be a custody FAIL. None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider — , a plain wallet, NOT the deployer — controls 52.0% of the liquidity holding up the price and can withdraw it at any moment. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and backs 5.0% of the token's pooled liquidity. The token's deepest pool (Uniswap V3, 90.7% of pooled liquidity) was assessed separately: an unclassified contract holds a controlling liquidity share; it is not proven locked.
No owner() function. No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy. The code is fixed.
Contract source is partially verified on the explorer — a bytecode-database match, not an exact source match.
No mint/pause/blacklist/limit functions found in bytecode.
No fee or limit toggling in the deployer's recent history.
Heads up: the scanner is improved continuously, and some fixes only surface once they meet real tokens on production. Our trusted registry — verified LP lockers, known-good launchpad contracts — is checked and approved by a human on the team, so a legitimate project can score lower for a while until we've confirmed its contracts ourselves. A low score is a prompt to look closer, not a conclusion.
Ask why this verdict reads the way it does.