ROBINHOOD CHAIN · ID 4663
THE VERDICT
The last receipt on record for this token — not a live scan.
1 VERDICT ON RECORD
None of this V3 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider — , a smart-account wallet, NOT the deployer — controls 21.8% of the liquidity holding up the price and can withdraw it at any moment. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. This pool is on Uniswap V3 and backs 99.2% of the token's pooled liquidity.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
Buy and sell both simulate cleanly, including as two independent fresh wallets.
No liquidity removal from this token's own pool, and none in the deployer's recent history.
WISHBONE scores 82 — CAUTION. LP custody is the one that moved it, 18 points off. Ask me why.
DRAWN FROM THIS VERDICT’S CHECKS — NOT A MODEL ANSWER
OPENS THE PANEL — THAT IS WHERE YOU TYPE
Buy and sell both simulate cleanly, including as two independent fresh wallets.
None of this V3 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider — , a smart-account wallet, NOT the deployer — controls 21.8% of the liquidity holding up the price and can withdraw it at any moment. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. This pool is on Uniswap V3 and backs 99.2% of the token's pooled liquidity.
No owner() function. No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy. The code is fixed.
Contract source is partially verified on the explorer — a bytecode-database match, not an exact source match.
No privileged capabilities found in the audited source and bytecode.
No fee or limit toggling in the deployer's recent history.
Heads up: the scanner is improved continuously, and some fixes only surface once they meet real tokens on production. Our trusted registry — verified LP lockers, known-good launchpad contracts — is checked and approved by a human on the team, so a legitimate project can score lower for a while until we've confirmed its contracts ourselves. A low score is a prompt to look closer, not a conclusion.
Ask why this verdict reads the way it does.